Thursday, February 13, 2014

Romeo's Manic Love

*I'm putting this here just in case my computer has a major meltdown and I lose my important essay*
*But woohoo for English projects*



Romeo’s Manic Love

John Alan Lee, a 20th century psychologist, studied the types of love seen in both fiction and non-fiction sources. In 1978, he wrote a book (The Colours of Love) that categorized love into six different types: storge (life-long friends), agape (completely selfless), mania (obsessive and intensely dependent), pragma (practicality), eros (sexuality and romance), and ludus (entertainment). Although many Shakespeare scholars believe Romeo to be an erotic lover, focused on intense amorous feelings and the more physical side of romance, I argue that he is, in fact, a manic lover, as evidenced by his obsession with both Rosaline and Juliet, the haste with which he approaches his emotions and his relationship with Juliet, and his depression and immediate suicide when he believed her to be dead.

            In the beginning of the play, we see Romeo pining over the object of his affection, Rosaline, who had previously snubbed his efforts to make her his bride. Even before Romeo’s entrance, his father tells Benvolio of Romeo’s recent depression: “Many a morning hath he there been seen,/With tears augmenting the fresh morning’s dew,/Adding to clouds more clouds with his deep sighs;/But all so soon as the all-cheering sun/Should in the farthest East begin to draw…Away from light steals home my heavy son…” (I.i.134-140) Lord Montague says, making it clear to the reader that Romeo has shut himself up in his room and refuses to see the light of day. This instantaneous drop into depression due to Rosaline’s rejection is a key aspect of manic love, as manic lovers are often crushed by rejection, be it real or speculative. Romeo’s love for Rosaline is not merely teenaged lust; it’s an unhealthy psychological obsession that carries over to Juliet as soon as he sees her at the masquerade ball. “Did my heart love till now? Forswear it, sight!” (I.v.54) he exclaims upon the sight of Juliet. He continues to say: “For I ne’er saw true beauty till this night” (I.v.55), although only a few scenes earlier he claimed that Rosaline was the most beautiful woman he had and would ever see, saying: “Show me a mistress that is passing fair:/What doth her beauty serve but as a note/Where I may read who passed that passing fair?” (I.i.237-9). This quick switch to obsession from his previous depression is a defining characteristic of manic lovers, who typically go in a cycle of elation while in a relationship to intense misery when out of one, then back to the elation as soon as they find another object of interest.

Another broad theme that encompasses Romeo’s love for Juliet is the reoccurring idea of haste. Romeo is hasty about everything. He rushes through his courtship of Juliet, quickly gets married, kills Tybalt in a flash, is banished for only a few days before he dashes back to the Capulet crypt, where he murders Paris in the blink of an eye and then swiftly downs the poison in one gulp. Romeo’s need to go fast in his personal life potentially prevents him from creating a more lasting and healthy bond with Juliet or any other possible love interests. Within the short time frame that the play takes place, Romeo does not get the opportunity to acquire the level of personal intimacy with Juliet that is necessary for a sustained and psychologically beneficial relationship. Rather, he speeds up the process of courtship to only a few days, projecting his idealized image of a lover onto Juliet. Manic love often is more of a reflection of the manic lover rather than an interaction with the object of desire, becoming a selfish need for approval based on one’s own anxiety rather than a mutual sense of fulfillment from one’s partner. The haste with which Romeo approaches his romantic life only amplifies his psychological need to be loved.

“Well, Juliet, I will lie with thee tonight” (V.i.34.) Romeo says as soon as he hears the news of Juliet’s “death”. This immediate drop into intense depression and talk of suicide at the absence of his love is another compelling piece of evidence towards Romeo’s mania. When only moments before he was dreamily speaking of her, saying: “How sweet is love itself possessed,/When but love’s shadows are so rich in joy” (V.i.10-1.) he is instantaneously thrown into a deep depression, completing the archetypal cycle of obsession to depression in only twenty-four lines of text. Suicidal ideation as response to rejection is a typical trait of manic lovers; even though Juliet’s faux-death is not the typical rejection, it still results in the absence of her affection towards Romeo. In fact, I even argue that if Rosaline had accepted his proposition of courtship and marriage, he would’ve readily committed suicide for her as well. As a teenager with manic love, Romeo needed someone to be an outlet for his affections, and the first person to reciprocate was Juliet. Manic love demands to be recognized, and that is why he fell so intensely for Juliet and was not willing to live in a world where her death means that she is no longer able to return his feelings.

Romeo and Juliet is often considered the greatest love story of all time, but Romeo, through his actions and behavior, is a perfect example of manic lover. From his obsession with his current object of desire, to his depression when they cannot reciprocate in turn, to the haste with which he experiences love, he clearly displays the important aspects of this psychologically unhealthy state.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Theatre Review: A Gentleman's Guide to Love and Murder


(I  actually wrote this for my acting class)

A Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder

Freedman and Lutvak’s A Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder (Gentleman’s Guide), a new musical to Broadway this fall season, is a refreshing and thoroughly enjoyable take on the classic murder comedy. Before going to see it, I refrained from reading any reviews or synopses as to be completely surprised and unprepared for whatever lay ahead of me in the darkened Walter Kerr Theater. Prior to the rise of the curtain, all I knew about the show was the fact that one man played eight different roles and that it was set in 1901 Britain, and all I expected was a lot of death, as indicated by the title. I got all that, and much, much more, ultimately coming away still grinning.
As the title suggests, Gentleman’s Guide is filled with nobility, brutal homicide, and, yes, even love. When Montague "Monty" Navarro's mother dies, a family friend surprises him with the news that he is, in fact, of the D'Ysquith family, a distinguished line of aristocracy his mother was disowned from for marrying his Castilian father. Not only is he a D'Ysquith, he's ninth in line for Highhurst Castle, and after the tragic death of the eighth in line that may or may not have been his fault, he decides to eliminate all of the heirs standing in his way--all, of course, alongside a witty song and dance number.
Being a Broadway production, every single one of the actors were highly trained and incredibly enjoyable to watch, including the versatile and coordinated ensemble that followed the leads throughout the production, but there is one performer that stands out above the rest—the multitalented and quick-changing Jefferson Mays. The performance of Jefferson Mays as the part of literally the entire D'Ysquith family, save Monty, (and yes, that includes the women) was, quite simply, astonishing. Although the characters were not written to be as diverse as one would like them to be, he portrayed each member of the D'Ysquith family with equal vigor and comedic prowess.  For someone whose characters die sixty-four times a week (eight heirs, eight nights a week), Mays manages to cleanly and precisely execute each quick change with impressive speed and efficiency—dying from an accidentally self-inflicted gunshot wound as flamboyant and busty Lady Salome D’Ysquith Pumphrey and then speedily rushing back on as cool, collected, and professional Asquith D’Ysquith, Sr. without so much as thirty-two bars of music to do so. Another performance that deserves to be highlighted is British actress and Broadway newcomer Lisa O’Hare in the role of Monty’s fickle and seductive mistress Sibella Hallward, who is consistently decked out in a spectrum of pink attire. O’Hare captured marvelously the fine line between being in an affair and being in a relationship with thinly veiled jealousy along with a flippant attitude towards the feelings she knows she has towards our murderous protagonist. Her chemistry with Monty, the cherubic Bryce Pinkham, never seemed forced or put on. And Sibella isn’t just some skirt-toting gold-digger, a surprising twist at the end puts her in a crucial role as Monty’s savior and Phoebe’s (his wife as of the second act) collaborator. The character proves herself to be a strong and capable woman, and O’Hare pulls off this development flawlessly.
With a stationary yet intricate frame reminiscent of the Victorian setting and a warm light cast over the entire stage, the set of Gentleman’s Guide was simple enough as to not distract from the performers but elaborate enough to provide intrigue for the audience and draw us into the scene in a more realistic way. There were various box sets and backdrops that came and went with various settings, each one well made and appropriate for the time period. I especially appreciated the balance between historical accuracy and comedic value in the costumes. Although dancing was minimal, the blocking and movement was done with precision only Broadway actors can achieve. Movement was especially impressive in the first song of the second act, “Why Are All The D’Ysquiths Dying?” and, my favorite song, “I’ve Decided to Marry You”, a highly coordinated fugue between Monty and the two lead women (Lisa O’Hare and Lauren Worsham). The music was clever and enjoyable, but it was nothing special, and up in the mezzanine I caught every word (kudos to the sound designers for their wonderful amplification). I came away humming one of the songs, a good sign for a musical, but I didn’t automatically go searching for a soundtrack. Many of the songs were predictable and reminiscent of Gilbert and Sullivan patter; Whether or not this was on purpose is beyond me. The director, Darko Tresnjak, does incredibly well with the material he was given; the characters all interact with one another with a passion and engagement under his guidance. Looking back, I wonder if there is something he could have done to make the show a bit more memorable, but overall it was a job well done.
A Gentleman's Guide to Love and Murder was a thoroughly enjoyable show. To be honest, it's not the best I've seen. It's not on my list of favorites, but it was just so lovely that I'll forever remember it as just a fun show. Sometimes, I think that people expect every musical to be deep and meaningful and leave the audience with some sort of moral, which is fine as well, and then criticize works that are just entertaining and silly for their lack of substance. Gentleman's Guide is reminiscent of more traditional musical theatre, like Cole Porter's Anything Goes or even more recent works such as The Drowsy Chaperone, a musical that plays off the older, vaudeville style of theatre; there's not much substance, but it's incredibly fun to watch. And that's exactly what Gentleman's Guide was—fun. There were parts where I was doubling over in laughter, like the innuendo-filled duet between oblivious Monty and the blatantly homosexual Henry D'Ysquith "Better With a Man" and the hysterical murder of the young Asquith D’Ysquith. Jr. and his secret girlfriend Ms. Barley “Poison In My Pocket” and what's the point of entertainment if not to entertain? 
Overall, Gentleman’s Guide was an entertaining evening that I won’t forget anytime soon. As expected, it was pulled off with the professional ability of some of the best actors in the country and the technical prowess of Broadway personnel. I enjoyed the show immensely.

Monday, April 1, 2013

Theatre Review: Altar Boyz


I've decided to start writing reviews of shows that I see. Mainly because I just see SO MANY FREAKING SHOWS, but also because I (a) love the theatre and (b) need to work on my journalistic skills. So, I'm starting with the most recent show I saw: Altar Boyz. Enjoy!

ALTAR BOYZ
Done by Seattle Musical Theatre at Magnuson Park
Book: Kevin Del Aguila
Music and Lyrics: Gary Adler and Michael Patrick Weller
Director and Choreographer: Troy Wageman
Music Director: Kimberly Dare
CAST
Matthew~Mark Tyler Miller
Mark~CJ Conrad
Luke~Eric Hagreen
Juan~Bo Mellinger
Abraham~Jeff Orton

Altar Boyz is arguably the strangest musical I've ever seen. Actually, I take that back, I did see The Wiz. Ugh, not a memory I want to relive. Middle school cast plus a mediocre, dated show? Bad combination. But I digress. Altar Boyz isn't... BROADWAY like some other shows are. Set up as the last night of their "Raise the Praise" tour, it's a boy bad rock concert. Think One Direction, 'N Sync, the Jonas Brothers--that sort of deal. With five members spreading the gospel (Matthew, the "leader", Mark, the gay one [okay, it's not actually ever said outright that he's gay, but he IS. He's basically falling all over Matthew the entire time it's definitely made flamingly apparent], Luke, the ex-drunk one who drives the tour bus, Juan, the Latin one, and Abraham, the Jewish one), it's incredibly cast dependent. You need five, TIGHT guys who can pull off the whole 90s boy band vibe. And that's where this production of Altar Boyz was lacking. But wait, let's look at the positives before going to the negatives.
It's a great show. The idea sounds weird. And yes, it is VERY weird. But it works. It manages to tell a story without TELLING A STORY in the way that Into the Woods or Xanadu does. The dialogue is full-on laugh-inducing, something not easily achievable, and I spent a lot of the time with my friend leaning on my shoulder and just crying with giggles. It's the perfect mix of satire with the obliviousness of the characters on stage with just the right touch of sappy sweetness at the end with I Believe without becoming preachy (well, the entire show is preaching, but that's the point--they're a Christian rock group trying to "save souls"... you know what I mean by preachy). I can tell why my dad saw it multiple times off-Broadway; something he rarely does or want to do. The music really IS boy band music, from the "get-up-and-dance-song" (Rhythm in Me) to the "girl-you-got-it-goin'-on song" (Something About You). There's dancing, excessive vocal runs, prancing about the stage, everything you could possibly want at a rock concert. Except it's all Christianity-centric. Being a non-Christian myself, I found it hilarious. I think it would be even funnier for a Christian, providing that they're not offended by it. Overall, I loved it, even if some things WERE lacking.
WHICH BRINGS US TO THE NEGATIVES, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN!
As I stated earlier, the show is incredibly cast-dependent, making it a great Broadway musical but a tough community theatre production. To make things simpler, I'll go down the line with the characters, and then I'll talk about the whole show in general.
Matthew: Mark Tyler Miller was absolutely amazing. He was really a different level from the other boys, as good as they were. He has this lovely, standard voice that I can tell is suited for anything from pop music (as is the case in Altar Boyz) to generic musical theatre repertoire (as was the case when he understudied for multiple roles for The Village Theater's production of Fiddler on the Roof). He played up the "good Christian" just enough that it was noticeably satirical but not so much that it was annoying. And he's also got that boy band "oooooh smolder" look to him. That didn't hurt.
Mark: How can you not love Mark? The minute CJ Conrad walked onto the stage my gaydar just exploded. From the tight purple pants to the voice to the very subtlest of movements, he CAMPED IT UP. And it was a good kind of camp. The kind of camp that just makes you smile every time he hits the stage with his fabulosity. He may have replaced Elder McKinley (The Book of Mormon) in my mind as the reigning champion of fabulous musical theatre characters. In fact, one of my favorite moments in musical theatre is from Mark. Very near to the end of the show, the Altar Boyz are lamenting over the sins they've exemplified, and CJ Conrad perfectly delivered Mark's "Lust," with his eyes running over Matthew. It was such a quick moment in between a slurry of other dialogue that it could've been lost, but it was just so precisely timed that it made my night. My only problem was that his voice wasn't particularly suited to the role. He was very good, but he wasn't BOY BAND, he was BROADWAY, and in that way it made the show suffer a little bit. He needed to be able to deliver the overbearing vocal runs and riffs that we all know so well from year upon drawn-out year of American Idol, and he couldn't. But his acting and the endearing character made it up at least somewhat.
Luke: I so wish he had enunciated a little bit more. It might've been the sound system, which wasn't exactly top notch, but I could barely understand the majority of his rap in The Miracle Song. He was definitely good, albeit he looked so much like Bill Hader it was hard to take him seriously, and I'm sad that I missed him as Moritz Stiefel in Spring Awakening (not only that, but I MISSED SPRING AWAKENING). And even though his character wasn't quite as appealing to me as the others, he made it work well, and his singing voice was pleasant to listen to (though his mic should've been turned up higher, but that's not his problem). Overall, a good review for Eric Hagreen.
Juan: I would like to personally congratulate Bo Mellinger on his consistent Spanish accent. That's hard, man. It's difficult to keep up and accent while talking, especially for a prolonged period of time, but while singing? Forget about it. Again, as with Eric Hagreen, I wish his microphone was turned up louder, because with the accent and the sound system and the music behind him it was hard to understand him while singing. That said, he did a wonderful job of enunciating while speaking. His monologue about "coveting they neighbors ass" was hilarious and well delivered, and he flaunted the Latin American thing enough for it to be slightly offensive but still relatively benign. One of my major problems with the production was a Juan-centric scene, but I'll wait until later in this review to touch on that.
Abraham: The idea of a Jewish member in a Christian boy band is funny by itself. From the moment the production opened with We are the Altar Boyz, in which they introduce each member of the band, ending with, "Abraham... he's Jewish!" I knew that I would enjoy this show. Jeff Orton's voice was, out of the five boys, probably the most "rock and roll", which was most definitely a good thing. I guess I don't really have much to say about him. He was absolutely fine and did a wonderful job.
Now onto the overall production. In general, it was fine. It was sweet, funny, everything a community theatre production should be. Unfortunately, it was a bit lagging. The point of Altar Boyz is that it's their last show of their "Raise the Praise" tour, and they should be as tight as hell by now. Although the band was acceptably tight, things weren't moving as fast as they should have. There were periods of lag time, most notably in the scene prior to La Vida Eternal, there was a lot of... nothingness where there should have been something. In addition to that, Juan's breakdown was carried on a bit too long for my taste--it was funny at first but then it just got annoying. Earlier today, I watched some clips of the original cast (or one of the original casts) doing We are the Altar Boyz, and it was a noticeable difference from the production we saw last night. It was so fast; BOOM BOOM BOOM in every little delivery, while last night took its time and meandered. There was too much dead time.

Overall, I really enjoyed the show. It may not have been the greatest production ever, but it was fun and I'm so glad that I got to see it. Until next time, this is Emma, signing off and wishing YOU a de-lovely evening.

(Get it? De-lovely? Like in Anything Goes? No? Okay.)

Monday, February 18, 2013

Character Profiles

Recently, I've been planning for a story/hopeful novel that I'm writing. One thing that I've always found in my writing is that my characters are all annoyingly two-dimensional, which makes for an annoyingly two-dimensional storyline. Most people think that the plot is the most important thing in a novel, but (sadly), they're wrong. It's the characters. Without the characters, there couldn't even BE a plot! There wouldn't be anyone for crap to happen to, and therefore no crap! So, your characters need to be good. No, not good. Interesting. What makes YOUR character special? Why should they get attention? You have to work to get people to pay attention to your character.
ANYWAYS, I've been poking around for in-depth character profile questionnaires, and I've found some really great ones. Here are some links that you should really follow.
http://www.squidoo.com/character-development-questions (this one is really long and in-depth. It helps to fill out all of the questions)
http://www.squidoo.com/CharacterProfiles (I pick and choose from this list. It's not as professional as the one above, but it gives you some cool things to think about. One thing I would recommend would be the "If I were a..." section. It really makes you think about your character in an abstract way, plus it's fun. I found it amusing to read the one pertaining to my character to my dad and then quiz him on my character's characteristics [wow, awkward phrase])
http://suspense.net/profile.htm (This is the first profile that I used. It's great for covering the basics, and it has an interview where the character responds with their own voice, which is incredibly helpful)
http://www.andyshack.com/2009/07/09/writing-characters-using-the-proust-questionnaire/ (This one gives you some traditional questions, but it's better to just paroose this and use it for inspiration. As the author says, it's dry and boring. The comments are useful, though)
With those handy links aside, I give you the MOST AMAZING CHARACTER PROFILE QUESTIONNAIRE IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE, compiled, written, and edited by me. It may resemble some of the profiles above, format wise, but it includes what I think was missing and excludes what I think is unimportant.

THE BASICS
First name:
Middle name:
Last name:
Nickname: If any.
Sex:
Age:
Birthday:
Birthplace:
Current residence/location: Where are they now?
Do they have an accent?: Bonus: does it mean something about them?
Ethnicity: What is their ethnic background?
Sexual orientation: Most questionnaires skip this question. I think it's important.
Gender orientation: Again, important but sadly skipped over.
Do they have any allergies, diseases, or other physical weaknesses?:
Zodiac sign: I don't believe that the position of the stars when you are born has anything to do with personality, but it can give you some good ideas on traits for your character.
Chinese zodiac sign: I dunno, it's something good to know about your character.

APPEARANCE-how do they look? Be as descriptive as you can.
Height: approximately
Weight: approximately
Eyes: color, shape, are they close or wide set?
Hair: what color? What style? Is it greasy? Thin? Long? Short? Beehive?
Other facial details:
Skin tone: Are they Snooki orange? Dracula pale? Edward sparkly?
Body type: are they wiry? Athletic? Gangly? Thick?
Piercings?:
Tattoos?: Bonus: Do they mean anything about them?
How do they dress?: Bonus: Would they dress this way if all options were open to them?
Do they alter their appearance regularly?: With hair dye, makeup, etc.?
On a scale of 1-10, 10 being drop-dead gorgeous and 1 being hideously deformed, where are they?: You could also just say that they're physically attractive, fairly plain, or unattractive.
Do they have an accurate mental picture of themselves?: E.g. They think they're a 5 when they're actually a 9, or they think they're fat when they're not.
Do they have any scars? Where are they from?: Bonus: are they important in the plot?
Do they have any distinguishing features?: A mole, birthmark, whatever.
Other appearance details:

BACKSTORY-it's important for your character to have a backstory. After all, we must know where we came from to know where we are going.
Mother: Biologically? Socially?
Father:
Siblings?:
Step-parents/siblings?:
What was/is their education like? Specify what school or what type of school they went/go to.
What did/do they want to be when they grew/grow up?:
What do/did their parents want them to be?:
What is their earliest memory?: Bonus: does it say something about them or connect to the plot?
Do they have any children? If so, how many?: What are their names and their ages?
What is the most noteworthy thing they've done?: Bonus: To themselves? To people around them? Are they different things for different people?
What is the most embarrassing thing to happen to them?: Bonus: Has it affected the way they act today?
What is the most frightening thing to happen to them?: Bonus: Again, has it affected the way they act today?
What is their best memory?: The memory they would use to create a Patronus charm.
What is their worst memory?: The memory left after a run-in with Dementors.


RELATIONSHIPS-not just romantic ones, also friendships. It shows a lot about a person by what friends they have.
Do they have a significant other? What is their name?: Bonus: How long have they been together? Do their parents approve? Are they also a main character? Is their relationship important to the plot?
Do they have a best friend? What is their name?:
Any other friends?:
How is their relationship with their parents?: Is it tense? Is it loving? Is it distant?
Do they have a lot of romantic relationships? Serious, or short term?: Give examples. List them and say how long they lasted.
Do they fall in and out of love quickly, or do they tend to get stuck on a single person?:
Do strangers an acquaintances actually LIKE them when they meet them?:
Can they get people to do what they want them to? If so, how?:
What is their "social group"?: Are they a jock? A nerd? A prep? Emo, scene, outcast?
Do they like children? Do they want children of their own?:
Are they married? If so, to whom?: Bonus: Do they matter?
What's their temper like?: Bonus: Does it affect their relationships?
Who is their worst enemy? Do they even have a nemesis?: Bonus: Are they important to the plot?
Are they a leader or a follower?: Bonus: If they're a leader, what kind are they? A quiet leader, or a bold and brassy one?
Do they have any pets?: If so, what are their names and how old are they?

TASTES-what do they like? What do they dislike?
What is their favorite color?:
Favorite food?:
What kind of books do they like?: Bonus: What's their favorite book? What is their least favorite genre/book?
What kind of movies/TV shows do they like?: Bonus: What's their favorite movie? Favorite TV show? What is their least favorite genre/movie/TV show?
What is their favorite kind of music?: What is their favorite song? Favorite band? Bonus: Does it differ from what music they like to make, if they like to play music? Do they even LIKE music? What's their least favorite type of music/song?
Are they hedonistic? Or does practicality rarely/sometimes/often/always win out?:
Are they addicted to anything?: This can be anywhere from heroin to diet coke.
Do they drink coffee on a regular basis? What about tea? Soft drinks?:
What's their favorite ice cream flavor?:
Is there any store (it can be a restaurant or a café) that they frequent at?: Like how people have that one coffee shop that they just ALWAYS go to.
What do they do to amuse themselves when there is nothing around like print or technology?:
Other tastes that I missed?:

MORALS AND BELIEFS-this section focuses on what they believe is right or wrong.
Do their morals match up with the people/society around them?: I've never actually seen this question anywhere, although it's very important. This distinguishes a villain from a hero.
Religion: Bonus: Is religion an important part of their life? Do their beliefs manifest physically (ex. a kippah, a cross necklace, a burqa, etc.)? Is it different from their family's religion? Have they ever converted? By force or by choice?
Political association: Bonus: Is it different from their parents'?
Do they have an internal or external moral code?: Do they get their right and wrong from inside themselves, or from a book like the Bible, the Tanakh, the Quoran, etc.?
Do they value faith/instinct more highly than logic/reason?: Bonus: Is what they value different from what they often act upon (do they value logic but often act upon faith, vice versa)?
Do they have any specific non-religious beliefs that manifest obviously?: Are they vegetarian because they believe in animal rights, etc.?
Are they respectful of the beliefs of others? To what extent?: Bonus: Is there a time when they were disrespectful? Was it for a good reason?
Have they ever harassed someone because of their beliefs/differences?: Have they ever been racist? Have they yelled anti-gay slurs at someone? Have they ever beat someone up for these differences?
Have they ever been harassed by someone because of their beliefs/differences?: Bonus: Did these events shape this character in some way?
Would they be more likely to act for the good of many, or for the good of one?: Bonus: What if the "one" was someone they knew personally/loved? Would their answer change?
Are they glass-half-full or glass-half-empty?: Other options include: There's a glass? My glass is shattered on the floor. There is exactly one millimeter of water more than air. I MUST MEASURE THE GLASS! We're all going to die; accept that and drink whatever's left of your poisoned water.
If someone hit (physically or metaphorically) them, would they "hit" back or turn the other cheek?: Do they believe in "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" or do they believe in not sinking to their level?
Are they superstitious?: This can range from doing voodoo magic to ward off evil spirits to knocking on wood.
Is there anyone or anything they would die for?:

GENERAL KNOWLEDGE-what do they know about, not counting academics?
Can they navigate their local area alone without getting lost?: Bonus: What about Toledo (a maze-like castle town in Spain)? To what extent do their directional gifts/lack of gifts go to?
Are they politically knowledgable?: Bonus: In their own country? What about the rest of the world? Do they generally know conflicts going on in other places?
How are they with technology? Are they a code-monkey? Just average? Completely hopeless?: Bonus: Does this match up with their background (e.g. are they 60 years old and a computer whiz, 17 and completely hopeless [digital native or digital immigrant])?
Could they paint a house? WITHOUT making a complete mess of it?:
Could they back a cake? Would you eat the cake?: Would the cake eat you?
Do they know how to change the oil and water in a car? How about the tires?:
Do they know the price of a loaf of bread?:
Would they be able to successfully order food in another country of which they didn't speak the language? Would they waiter spit in their food?:

SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE-what do they know, academic wise?
Do they have any specific qualifications in a particular field?: Like a GED, AA, doctorate, etc?
Is there something that they would be considered a genius in?:
Do they have some sort of special talent?: This can be from wiggling your ears to memorizing 500,000 digits of Pi.
Do they actively seek knowledge, or just let is come naturally?:
Have they ever been bullied for knowing a lot about something?:
Does their cultural background effect what people think they know?: People may be surprised at a kid from a bad area of town setting the curve for his math class.
Have they ever been publicly acknowledged for being good at something?: Like an award or medal, ranging from a 3rd place ribbon at a track meet to a Nobel Prize.

WHAT IF...?-these questions explore a more abstract side of your character.
What if they had been born a different biological sex?: Bonus: Let's say that their gender orientation did not match with their biological sex. What would they do to cope?
What if they had another sibling? Would it matter if they were older or younger, brother or sister?:
Pick a key event in their history. What if it had gone differently? Where would they be today, in what situation?: Bonus: Would their life be changed for the better, or for the worse?
What if they lost a limb?: Bonus: Would it matter which limb?
What if they were betrayed by someone they loved?: Bonus: Would it be different for romantic love vs familial/friend love?
What if he lost a limb?: Bonus: Would the reaction depend on which limb?
Any other What If questions you want to answer?:


CHARACTER INTERVIEW
This is sadly left out of many profile sheets, but I think it's so necessary. You need to learn how to write in your character's voice, and what's better than an interview to help you along? These are pretty random questions because the main point of this exercise is the voice. These are all from http://www.squidoo.com/CharacterProfiles, but I weeded out what I thought were the best/most interesting. There are many, many more on there, though.

Who was your first crush, and when?:
What bad habits do you have?:What's your weapon of choice, and why?:How do you define what is good or morally desirable?:Do humans taste like chicken?: This is purely a reaction question. How would your character react if asked this?Do you have any close cousins?:Would you sacrifice someone you loved for a good enough cause?:What are your views on marriage?:What virtue do you lack most?:What do you think about telepaths?What's your type?:Is the glass half empty or half full?:If someone extracted your should from your body, what do you think it would look like?:What is the most mundane, simple thing you like to do?:Do you like coffee?:If you did want to take over the world, how long do you think it would take you?:If you had to sleep with your worst enemy to save the world, would you?It's five minutes to eight and dinner is not ready. At eight, you guests are arriving. What do you do?:Name your favorite childhood story?:How many relationships have you been in?:What is your idea of a perfect evening?:What do you wear on a daily basis?:Are you an early bird or a night owl?:What member of your family is your favorite? Least favorite?:What is your greatest regret? Would you go back to change things if you could?:What song did your mom/dad used to sing you as a kid?:What's in your bathroom medicine cabinet right now?:Do you consider yourself normal?:What is your least attractive trait?:What is your biggest pet peeve?:Which matters more, justice or the law?: Haha, Valjean or Javert!
If you could bring someone back from the dead, who would it be?:What's the weirdest thing you've ever eaten?:You run into someone from your past whom you hate. What do you do?:If you had to kill your best friend to help them, would you?: Like if they were a vampire and didn't want to be, got bitten by a zombie, became one of the Borg, etc.What is the one thing about society that aggravates you most?:What is your opinion on rabbits?:Do you believe in an ever-lasting love?:Do you have any hidden talents?:How would your best friend describe you?:If you encountered the Mirror of Erised from the Harry Potter series, what would you see?:What is the first thing you do when you wake up?:What is the last thing you do before you go to sleep?:If someone came and slaughtered your entire family, would you seek revenge, or turn to the path of peace and try to put it behind you?:What makes your easy or hard to get along with?:How do you take your tea?:If you were a musical instrument, what would you be?:What is your favorite weather?:


It's also helpful to have your character fill this out:




  • If I were a month, I would be
  • If I were a day of the week, I would be
  • If I were a time of day, I would be
  • If I were a planet, I would be
  • If I were a sea animal, I would be
  • If I were a direction, I would be
  • If I were a historical figure, I would be
  • If I were a liquid, I would be
  • If I were a bird I would be
  • If I were a cat I would be
  • If I were a dog I would be
  • If I were a tree, I would be
  • If I were a tool, I would be
  • If I were a flower, I would be
  • If I were a type of weather, I would be
  • If I were an animal, I would be
  • If I were a season I would be
  • If I were a holiday I would be
  • If I were a color, I would be
  • If I were an emotion, I would be
  • If I were a sound, I would be
  • If I were an element, I would be
  • If I were a car, I would be
  • If I were a food, I would be
  • If I were a place, I would be
  • If I were a body of water I would be
  • If I were a song I would be
  • If I were a book I would be
  • If I were a gemstone I would be
  • If I were a metal I would be
  • If I were a word, I would be
  • Tuesday, July 3, 2012

    Umbrellas

    It's raining. Actually, a better word for the wet disaster outside my window would probably be pouring. It's pouring. And no, no old man is snoring. It started raining around two and a half hours ago, and hasn't stopped since. At 3:15, I had to walk to my piano lesson, which is four houses away. I took an umbrella, because, as I mentioned before, it was pouring. Now, I almost never use an umbrella. I live in Seattle. For all that I know, nobody uses an umbrella. It's just always wet or raining, so nobody bothers with them. Half of the time, I don't even know that I'm getting rained on. Anyway, the rain was bad enough that I took a little black umbrella we purchased in Paris at a crappy souvenir store for 6 euro (we were waiting in line for Notre Dame, and it started to drizzle on us. We had a while left to go, so we decided to buy an umbrella). Standing under the covering clutching my books to my chest, I felt strangely invincible. I'm not going to be stopped by some damn rain! I AM INDESTRUCTIBLE! I valiantly sloshed to my piano lesson, tried my best not to fall down the stairs when my "shield" caught on the overhead trees. I marched to the covered doorway, folded up the black umbrella, and placed it next to the entryway. I was no longer invincible. My vulnerability seeped back into my soul like spilled milk soaking a paper towel. I shook the feeling, and went into my lesson, missing my carefree days of umbrella-hood.
    This may seem a bit silly (okay, a lot silly), but I am seriously in love with umbrellas now.

    EDIT: Wow, what a weird first non-poetry related post.

    Friday, February 17, 2012

    A Reflection on Poetry


    Poetry is
    A churning sea
    Crashing onto the shore.
    Poetry is
    A delicate flower
    Waving in the wind.
    Poetry is
    A soaring eagle
    Mighty, majestic, beautiful.
    Poetry is
    A golden wind
    Sweeping across the land.
    Poetry is
    A dance under the midnight moon.
    A song as old as time.
    Poetry is.

    I’ve always enjoyed writing poetry (after all, I did write an “All About Poetry” book in third grade), but this year I think I have really blossomed in poetry. Rhyming poems have never been my strength (I’m decent at limericks and couplets but mediocre at everything else), but I’m actually proud of my nonsense poem “Where I Like to Be”.  I still enjoy writing non-structured poems more than structured ones, but I made huge leaps in my skill.  Surprisingly, my favorite poem of mine is “Loud Talkers”.  I didn’t even know what a bitterness poem was until the day I wrote it! It’s a very different kind of poem that I’ve written before, and I love it. Should I be worried that my bitterness poem is my favorite?
    Sometimes, poetry is too flowery for my liking. The occasional metaphor is great (it adds depth and is wonderful for emotional expression), but when everything is a metaphor it gets a little convoluted. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I almost want to say to the author, “You know, it’s great that you have these deep emotions that can only be expressed through confusing poetry, but you REALLY need to lay off the figurative language!”
    Something that I love about poetry is that it’s a creative outlet for bottled-up emotions. Instead of hitting a pillow or even just typing angrily, you can write poetry. Because of the figurative language, it tends to be much more expressive than other forms of prose, and because grammar isn’t a top priority is can be more artistic. Overall, I adore writing poetry and hope to improve in later years.